"Interim Injunction Ruling Regarding Restriction on Participation in National Research and Development"
Article posted in 2024-07-10 15:40:50 | VEAT
Law firm Veat successfully represented a researcher A (hereinafter "Client") who participated in a thesis judged as plagiarized, and obtained a ruling to suspend the execution of the decision.
The Client received a National R&D Participation Restriction decision due to participating in a thesis judged as plagiarized. Accordingly, the Client entrusted Law firm Veat with a request to suspend the execution of the decision until the final judgment in the main lawsuit, as it could greatly disrupt the researcher's re-employment and research activities.
Law firm Veat carefully reviewed the case and emphasized the circumstances under which the Client participated in writing the thesis, the specific role, and a detailed explanation of the thesis, to highlight the impossibility of recognizing plagiarism in the writing process. Through this, the lack of intent to plagiarize was emphasized, and the unfairness of the decision was proven.
In particular, it emphasized that there was a high possibility that the Client would be rejected from re-employment if the execution stay was not granted. It emphasized that the R&D Participation Restriction decision is not only a non-property decision restricting the researcher's research activities, but also has a high possibility of causing unexpected losses to third parties, and requested the court to suspend the execution of the decision before the final judgment, taking these factors into consideration comprehensively.
The court accepted the arguments of Law firm Veat and ruled to suspend the execution for up to 30 days after the final judgment.
Importance of the "National R&D Innovation Act" and Legal Response
The "National R&D Innovation Act" is a law that aims to enhance national innovation capabilities and improve the quality of life by innovating the promotion system for national R&D projects and creating an autonomous and responsible research environment to promote the development of the national economy. Therefore, there is a case where the court ruled that "actively utilizing the National R&D project participation restriction decision to exclude capable researchers from national R&D projects for a long period may undermine the ultimate purpose of the law, and administrative agencies must carefully determine the participation restriction and its duration.”
Therefore, when you receive a National R&D project participation restriction decision, you need to prove specific forms, research purpose achievement, research results and achievements, and the behavior of researchers, considering various factors. Accordingly, it is important to comprehensively review with the help of a legal expert who has a deep understanding of the case and argue illegality to the court.
Law firm Veat has provided legal advice to various companies as counsel/advisors, carefully reviewing legal disputes arising from relationships with government ministries that clients are having difficulty with and managing legal issues effectively.
If you need help with administrative matters, please contact Law firm Veat.
Thank you.
Law firm Veat